I haven't tested it yet (I am in a conference) but changing your security settings shouldn't be taken lightly.

I started the nopesport thread with the same wording as below.

cheers

JK

> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Britton [mailto:ajohnbritton@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 2:28 PM
> To: Kewley, John (STFC,DL,SC); mdoc@simplelists.com
> Subject: Re: [MDOC] Routegadget
>
> There's a thread on Nopesport ... I've just posted the following reply to some
> helpful comments by Jagge (the original author, I think) ...
>
> I'm still running XP and I allowed Java to update itself this morning. And
> Routegadget came up with an error, which couldn't be got round.
> I then went to Control Panel, and ran the Java control panel and set my Security
> down to Medium, as per your instructions.
> I had to restart my browser (Chrome) but now it has the same behaviour as
> before - asks do you really want to run this application and then happily runs it
> when you say yes.
>
> So  ....  Don't Panic !!! (but you have to do some stuff)
>
> John
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <john.kewley@stfc.ac.uk>
> To: <mdoc@simplelists.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 10:49 AM
> Subject: [MDOC] Routegadget
>
>
> The latest revision of Java7 (51) has changed the way it allows code to run
> in applets unless signed by an appropriate signatory.
>
> So what does that mean?
>
> As I understand it that means that until Routegadget code is generated
> differently then people with the latest Java (issued today)
> will not be able to access our Routegadget pages.
>
> cheers
>
> JK--
> Scanned by iCritical.

--
Scanned by iCritical.